Who is better, Alcott or Calcavecchia?
Mark Calcavecchia leads with a GOAT score of 84.2 against 84.1 for Amy Alcott — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Alcott vs Calcavecchia
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Mark Calcavecchia above Amy Alcott: 84.2 vs 84.1. Mark Calcavecchia leads on Longevity, Statistics, Peak. Amy Alcott leads on Honours, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
CalcavecchiaWinner
84.2Calcavecchia wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics
Alcott
84.1Alcott wins: Dominance, Honours
Candidates
Locked to GolfShareable URL · /compare/amy-alcott-vs-mark-calcavecchia
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Mark Calcavecchia
84.2
Calcavecchia leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Mark Calcavecchia
2. Amy Alcott
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇺🇸 Amy Alcott5 seasons played · career day 1,82510 wins
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Mark Calcavecchia5 seasons played · career day 3,6517 wins
-30.0% vs Alcott at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Alcott | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 22 |
| 🇺🇸 Calcavecchia | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | AlcottRetired | CalcavecchiaActive |
|---|---|---|
| Major titles | 5 | — |
| LPGA wins | 29 | — |
| Hall of Fame inductions | 1 | — |
| Vare Trophy wins | 1 | — |
| Seasons with a win | 15 | — |
| Major championships | — | 1 |
| PGA Tour wins | — | 13 |
| Ryder Cup appearances | — | 4 |
| Champions Tour wins | — | 1 |
| Seasons on tour | — | 40 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 76 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 86 | 90 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 88 |
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Calcavecchia84.2
Alcott84.1
FAQ
Where does Alcott beat Calcavecchia?
Alcott scores higher on dominance, honours. Calcavecchia leads on peak, statistics, longevity.
How is the Alcott vs Calcavecchia score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Alcott: 84.1, Calcavecchia: 84.2.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Alcott vs Calcavecchia. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.