Who is better, Grubba or Dvořáček?
Josef Dvořáček leads with a GOAT score of 82.5 against 82.2 for Andrzej Grubba — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Josef Dvořáček above Andrzej Grubba: 82.5 vs 82.2. Josef Dvořáček leads on Honours, Statistics, Dominance. Andrzej Grubba leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Dvořáček wins: Dominance, Honours, Statistics
Grubba wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/andrzej-grubba-vs-josef-dvoracek
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Dvořáček leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇵🇱 Grubba | 0 | 0 | 48 | 104 | 320 | 686 |
| 🇨🇿 Dvořáček | 0 | 0 | 50 | 109 | 336 | 672 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | GrubbaRetired | DvořáčekRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Championship medals | 3 | 3 |
| European titles | 2 | — |
| Career high world ranking | 2 | — |
| Europe Top 12 wins | 2 | — |
| Years at the top level | 21 | — |
| Czechoslovak titles | — | 4 |
| European Championship medals | — | 1 |
| World Championship appearances | — | 6 |
| Swaythling Cup appearances | — | 5 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 80 | 84 |
Josef Dvořáček leads with a GOAT score of 82.5 against 82.2 for Andrzej Grubba — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Grubba scores higher on longevity. Dvořáček leads on dominance, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Grubba: 82.2, Dvořáček: 82.5.
Make your case for Grubba vs Dvořáček. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.