Who is better, Grubba or Hasegawa?
Andrzej Grubba leads with a GOAT score of 82.2 against 82.0 for Nobuhiko Hasegawa — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Andrzej Grubba above Nobuhiko Hasegawa: 82.2 vs 82.0. Andrzej Grubba leads on Longevity. Nobuhiko Hasegawa leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Grubba wins: Longevity
Hasegawa wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/andrzej-grubba-vs-nobuhiko-hasegawa
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Grubba leads in 1 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇵🇱 Grubba | 0 | 0 | 48 | 104 | 320 | 686 |
| 🇯🇵 Hasegawa | 0 | 0 | 58 | 126 | 388 | 702 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | GrubbaRetired | HasegawaRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Championship medals | 3 | 5 |
| European titles | 2 | — |
| Career high world ranking | 2 | — |
| Europe Top 12 wins | 2 | — |
| Years at the top level | 21 | 11 |
| World Championship singles titles | — | 1 |
| World team titles | — | 2 |
| Asian Championship titles | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 70 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 80 | 82 |
Andrzej Grubba leads with a GOAT score of 82.2 against 82.0 for Nobuhiko Hasegawa — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Hasegawa scores higher on peak, dominance, honours, statistics. Grubba leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Grubba: 82.2, Hasegawa: 82.0.
Make your case for Grubba vs Hasegawa. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.