Who is better, Nordqvist or Strange?
Anna Nordqvist leads with a GOAT score of 80.1 against 80.1 for Curtis Strange — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Anna Nordqvist and Curtis Strange level at 80.1. Anna Nordqvist leads on Longevity, Honours. Curtis Strange leads on Peak, Dominance, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Nordqvist wins: Longevity, Honours
Strange wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/anna-nordqvist-vs-curtis-strange
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Nordqvist leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇸🇪 Nordqvist | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 11 |
| 🇺🇸 Strange | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 10 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | NordqvistActive | StrangeRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Major titles | 3 | 2 |
| LPGA wins | 9 | — |
| Solheim Cup appearances | 8 | — |
| Ladies European Tour wins | 5 | — |
| Olympic appearances | 3 | — |
| PGA Tour wins | — | 17 |
| Money list titles | — | 3 |
| Ryder Cup appearances | — | 5 |
| PGA Player of the Year awards | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 74 | 76 |
| Peak w20% | 84 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 80 | 82 |
Anna Nordqvist leads with a GOAT score of 80.1 against 80.1 for Curtis Strange — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Strange scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. Nordqvist leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Nordqvist: 80.1, Strange: 80.1.
Make your case for Nordqvist vs Strange. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.