Who is better, Sörenstam or Couples?
Annika Sörenstam leads with a GOAT score of 92.8 against 84.8 for Fred Couples — a gap of 8.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Annika Sörenstam above Fred Couples: 92.8 vs 84.8. Annika Sörenstam leads on Dominance, Honours, Statistics. Fred Couples leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Sörenstam wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Couples wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/annika-sorenstam-vs-fred-couples
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Sörenstam leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Couples — Insufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 24
No verified birth date for Couples — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 24, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | SörenstamRetired | CouplesActive |
|---|---|---|
| Major titles | 10 | 1 |
| LPGA wins | 72 | — |
| Player of the Year awards | 8 | — |
| Vare Trophies | 6 | — |
| Career prize money (M USD) | 22.6 | — |
| Weeks at No. 1 | 60 | — |
| PGA Tour wins | — | 15 |
| Players Championships | — | 2 |
| Weeks at world number one | — | 16 |
| Ryder Cup appearances | — | 5 |
| Dominance w25% | 95 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 96 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 90 |
| Honours w20% | 94 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 95 | 86 |
Annika Sörenstam leads with a GOAT score of 92.8 against 84.8 for Fred Couples — a gap of 8.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Couples scores higher on longevity. Sörenstam leads on peak, dominance, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Sörenstam: 92.8, Couples: 84.8.
Make your case for Sörenstam vs Couples. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.