Who is better, Sörenstam or Nicklaus?
Jack Nicklaus leads with a GOAT score of 95.0 against 92.8 for Annika Sörenstam — a gap of 2.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Jack Nicklaus above Annika Sörenstam: 95.0 vs 92.8. Jack Nicklaus leads on Longevity, Honours. Annika Sörenstam leads on Statistics, Peak, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Nicklaus wins: Longevity, Honours
Sörenstam wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/annika-sorenstam-vs-jack-nicklaus
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Nicklaus leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 22
Sörenstam is -100.0% behind Nicklaus's pace at age 22
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 22, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | SörenstamRetired | NicklausRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Major titles | 10 | — |
| LPGA wins | 72 | — |
| Player of the Year awards | 8 | 5 |
| Vare Trophies | 6 | — |
| Career prize money (M USD) | 22.6 | — |
| Weeks at No. 1 | 60 | — |
| Major championships | — | 18 |
| PGA Tour wins | — | 73 |
| Weeks at world No. 1 | — | 0 |
| Career prize money (M$) | — | 5.7 |
| Major runner-up finishes | — | 19 |
| Dominance w25% | 95 | 94 |
| Peak w20% | 96 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 99 |
| Honours w20% | 94 | 99 |
| Statistics w15% | 95 | 90 |
Jack Nicklaus leads with a GOAT score of 95.0 against 92.8 for Annika Sörenstam — a gap of 2.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Sörenstam scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. Nicklaus leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Sörenstam: 92.8, Nicklaus: 95.0.
Make your case for Sörenstam vs Nicklaus. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.