Who is better, Källberg or Shin?
Shin Yu-bin leads with a GOAT score of 77.4 against 77.3 for Anton Källberg — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Shin Yu-bin above Anton Källberg: 77.4 vs 77.3. Shin Yu-bin leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours. Anton Källberg leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Shin wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Källberg wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/anton-kallberg-tt-vs-shin-yu-bin
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Shin leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇸🇪 Källberg | 0 | 0 | 48 | 101 | 288 | 604 |
| 🇰🇷 Shin | 0 | 0 | 58 | 128 | 392 | 570 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | KällbergActive | ShinActive |
|---|---|---|
| World Championship team medals | 2 | — |
| European team medals | 3 | — |
| Olympic appearances | 2 | — |
| Career world ranking best | 12 | — |
| Swedish titles | 4 | — |
| Olympic medals | — | 2 |
| World Championship medals | — | 2 |
| WTT titles | — | 3 |
| Asian Championship medals | — | 3 |
| Career high world ranking | — | 4 |
| Dominance w25% | 72 | 76 |
| Peak w20% | 82 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 66 |
| Honours w20% | 78 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 78 | 80 |
Shin Yu-bin leads with a GOAT score of 77.4 against 77.3 for Anton Källberg — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Källberg scores higher on longevity. Shin leads on peak, dominance, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Källberg: 77.3, Shin: 77.4.
Make your case for Källberg vs Shin. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.