Who is better, Jutanugarn or Oosthuizen?
Ariya Jutanugarn leads with a GOAT score of 79.3 against 79.1 for Louis Oosthuizen — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Ariya Jutanugarn above Louis Oosthuizen: 79.3 vs 79.1. Ariya Jutanugarn leads on Dominance, Honours, Statistics. Louis Oosthuizen leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Jutanugarn wins: Dominance, Honours, Statistics
Oosthuizen wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/ariya-jutanugarn-vs-louis-oosthuizen
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Jutanugarn leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇹🇭 Jutanugarn | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 13 |
| 🇿🇦 Oosthuizen | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | JutanugarnActive | OosthuizenActive |
|---|---|---|
| Major titles | 2 | 1 |
| LPGA wins | 12 | — |
| Player of the Year awards | 1 | — |
| Weeks at world No. 1 | 29 | — |
| Vare Trophies | 1 | — |
| Major runner-up finishes | — | 6 |
| DP World Tour wins | — | 11 |
| PGA Tour wins | — | 2 |
| Presidents Cup appearances | — | 5 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 72 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 70 | 82 |
| Honours w20% | 78 | 74 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 82 |
Loading votes
Create a free account to vote and comment.
Sign in to voteAriya Jutanugarn leads with a GOAT score of 79.3 against 79.1 for Louis Oosthuizen — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Oosthuizen scores higher on longevity. Jutanugarn leads on dominance, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Jutanugarn: 79.3, Oosthuizen: 79.1.
Make your case for Jutanugarn vs Oosthuizen. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.