Who is better, Quadri or Cheung?
Cheung Yuk leads with a GOAT score of 79.8 against 79.7 for Aruna Quadri — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Cheung Yuk above Aruna Quadri: 79.8 vs 79.7. Cheung Yuk leads on Longevity, Statistics, Peak. Aruna Quadri leads on Honours, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Cheung wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics
Quadri wins: Dominance, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/aruna-quadri-tt-vs-cheung-yuk
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Cheung leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇳🇬 Quadri | 0 | 0 | 46 | 96 | 272 | 565 |
| 🇭🇰 Cheung | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 41 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | QuadriActive | CheungRetired |
|---|---|---|
| African Championship titles | 3 | — |
| Olympic quarter-finals | 2 | — |
| ITTF World Tour titles | 1 | — |
| Career world ranking best | 13 | — |
| All-Africa Games golds | 2 | — |
| World Championship medals | — | 2 |
| Asian Games medals | — | 3 |
| Olympic appearances | — | 4 |
| ITTF Pro Tour titles | — | 2 |
| Career span in years | — | 20 |
| Dominance w25% | 74 | 72 |
| Peak w20% | 84 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 88 |
| Honours w20% | 78 | 72 |
| Statistics w15% | 80 | 84 |
Cheung Yuk leads with a GOAT score of 79.8 against 79.7 for Aruna Quadri — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Quadri scores higher on dominance, honours. Cheung leads on peak, statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Quadri: 79.7, Cheung: 79.8.
Make your case for Quadri vs Cheung. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.