Who is better, Matthews or Carnegie?
Herb Carnegie leads with a GOAT score of 81.3 against 81.1 for Auston Matthews — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Matthews vs Carnegie
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Herb Carnegie above Auston Matthews: 81.3 vs 81.1. Herb Carnegie leads on Honours, Longevity. Auston Matthews leads on Statistics, Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
CarnegieWinner
81.3Carnegie wins: Longevity, Honours
Matthews
81.1Matthews wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Candidates
Locked to Ice HockeyShareable URL · /compare/auston-matthews-vs-herb-carnegie
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇨🇦 Herb Carnegie
81.3
Carnegie leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Herb Carnegie
2. Auston Matthews
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇺🇸 Auston Matthews5 seasons played · career day 1,826351 points
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇨🇦 Herb Carnegie5 seasons played · career day 1,826349 points
-0.6% vs Matthews at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Matthews | 0 | 0 | 69 | 132 | 285 | 727 |
| 🇨🇦 Carnegie | 0 | 0 | 55 | 117 | 264 | 667 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | MatthewsActive · Toronto Maple Leafs | CarnegieRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Rocket Richard Trophies | 3 | — |
| Hart Trophies | 1 | — |
| NHL goals | 400 | — |
| Calder Trophy | 1 | — |
| 50-goal seasons | 3 | — |
| All-Star selections | 6 | — |
| League MVP awards | — | 3 |
| Provincial league titles | — | 2 |
| Professional seasons | — | 11 |
| Hall of Fame inductions | — | 1 |
| All-star selections | — | 4 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 72 | 76 |
| Honours w20% | 76 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 84 |
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Carnegie81.3
Matthews81.1
FAQ
Where does Matthews beat Carnegie?
Matthews scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. Carnegie leads on honours, longevity.
How is the Matthews vs Carnegie score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Matthews: 81.1, Carnegie: 81.3.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Matthews vs Carnegie. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.