Who is better, Zaharias or Matsuyama?
Hideki Matsuyama leads with a GOAT score of 86.9 against 86.5 for Babe Didrikson Zaharias — a gap of 0.4 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Hideki Matsuyama above Babe Didrikson Zaharias: 86.9 vs 86.5. Hideki Matsuyama leads on Longevity, Statistics. Babe Didrikson Zaharias leads on Dominance, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Matsuyama wins: Longevity, Statistics
Zaharias wins: Dominance, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/babe-zaharias-vs-hideki-matsuyama
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Matsuyama leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Zaharias | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 🇯🇵 Matsuyama | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 8 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | ZahariasRetired | MatsuyamaActive |
|---|---|---|
| Major titles | 10 | 1 |
| LPGA Tour wins | 41 | — |
| Olympic golds | 2 | — |
| US Women's Open titles | 3 | — |
| Player of the Year | 2 | — |
| Consecutive wins | 14 | — |
| PGA Tour wins | — | 11 |
| Olympic medals | — | 1 |
| Presidents Cup appearances | — | 6 |
| Career-high world ranking | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 88 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 90 |
Hideki Matsuyama leads with a GOAT score of 86.9 against 86.5 for Babe Didrikson Zaharias — a gap of 0.4 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Zaharias scores higher on dominance, honours. Matsuyama leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Zaharias: 86.5, Matsuyama: 86.9.
Make your case for Zaharias vs Matsuyama. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.