Who is better, Bai or Pavlovich?
Bai Yang leads with a GOAT score of 83.3 against 83.3 for Viktoria Pavlovich — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Bai Yang and Viktoria Pavlovich level at 83.3. Bai Yang leads on Honours, Dominance, Peak. Viktoria Pavlovich leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Bai wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Pavlovich wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/bai-yang-tabletennis-vs-viktoria-pavlovich
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Bai leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇳 Bai | 0 | 0 | 50 | 109 | 338 | 655 |
| 🇧🇾 Pavlovich | 0 | 0 | 45 | 95 | 210 | 582 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BaiRetired | PavlovichRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Championship medals | 2 | — |
| ITTF Pro Tour titles | 3 | — |
| Asian Championship medals | 2 | — |
| Chinese national medals | 4 | — |
| World Championship appearances | 3 | — |
| European Championship medals | — | 4 |
| Olympic appearances | — | 5 |
| World ranking peak | — | 7 |
| Pro Tour titles | — | 2 |
| Belarusian titles | — | 12 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 88 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 84 |
Bai Yang leads with a GOAT score of 83.3 against 83.3 for Viktoria Pavlovich — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Pavlovich scores higher on longevity. Bai leads on peak, dominance, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Bai: 83.3, Pavlovich: 83.3.
Make your case for Bai vs Pavlovich. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.