GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Crenshaw vs Maruyama

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
CrenshawWinner
83.0

Crenshaw wins: Honours

Maruyama
83.0

Maruyama wins: Longevity, Statistics

Candidates
Locked to Golf

Shareable URL · /compare/ben-crenshaw-vs-shigeki-maruyama

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Ben Crenshaw
83.0

Crenshaw leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. Masters champion in 1984 and 1995, and the winning 1999 Ryder Cup captain.

1. Ben Crenshaw
83.0
2. Shigeki Maruyama
83.0

Category breakdown

Season form · Wins per season

Career timeline · Wins per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Wins per season
1. 🇺🇸 Ben Crenshaw5 seasons played · career day 1,825185 wins
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇯🇵 Shigeki Maruyama5 seasons played · career day 2,191132 wins
-28.6% vs Crenshaw at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇺🇸 Crenshaw002556185441
🇯🇵 Maruyama0004094174

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricCrenshawRetiredMaruyamaRetired
Masters titles2
PGA Tour wins193
Ryder Cup appearances4
Top-10 major finishes24
Seasons played43
Japan Golf Tour wins10
Presidents Cup appearances3
Lowest competitive round58
Highest world ranking9
Dominance w25%7878
Peak w20%9090
Longevity w20%8486
Honours w20%8274
Statistics w15%8290

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Crenshaw83.0
Maruyama83.0
The people
Crenshaw
Maruyama

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Crenshaw vs Maruyama. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →