Who is better, Duda or Ovtcharov?
Dimitrij Ovtcharov leads with a GOAT score of 72.5 against 72.4 for Benedikt Duda — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Dimitrij Ovtcharov above Benedikt Duda: 72.5 vs 72.4. Dimitrij Ovtcharov leads on Longevity. Benedikt Duda leads on Peak, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Ovtcharov wins: Longevity
Duda wins: Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/benedikt-duda-vs-ovtcharov
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Ovtcharov leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇩🇪 Duda | 0 | 0 | 50 | 106 | 304 | 614 |
| 🇩🇪 Ovtcharov | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | DudaActive | OvtcharovActive |
|---|---|---|
| European team golds | 2 | — |
| WTT titles | 2 | — |
| European Championship medals | 3 | — |
| Best world ranking | 18 | — |
| German league seasons | 12 | — |
| Olympic medals | — | 4 |
| European Championship singles titles | — | 2 |
| World Cup titles | — | 1 |
| European team titles | — | 6 |
| Months at No. 1 | — | 6 |
| ITTF Tour titles | — | 16 |
| Dominance w25% | 66 | 66 |
| Peak w20% | 78 | 76 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 82 |
| Honours w20% | 68 | 68 |
| Statistics w15% | 74 | 72 |
Dimitrij Ovtcharov leads with a GOAT score of 72.5 against 72.4 for Benedikt Duda — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Duda scores higher on peak, statistics. Ovtcharov leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Duda: 72.4, Ovtcharov: 72.5.
Make your case for Duda vs Ovtcharov. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.