Who is better, Duda or Wang M.?
Benedikt Duda leads with a GOAT score of 72.4 against 71.8 for Wang Manyu — a gap of 0.6 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Duda vs Wang M.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Benedikt Duda above Wang Manyu: 72.4 vs 71.8. Benedikt Duda leads on Longevity. Wang Manyu leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
DudaWinner
72.4Duda wins: Longevity
Wang M.
71.8Wang M. wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Candidates
Locked to Table TennisShareable URL · /compare/benedikt-duda-vs-wang-manyu
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇩🇪 Benedikt Duda
72.4
Duda leads in 1 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Benedikt Duda
2. Wang Manyu
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇩🇪 Benedikt Duda5 seasons played · career day 1,825304 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇨🇳 Wang Manyu5 seasons played · career day 2,55612 titles
-96.1% vs Duda at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇩🇪 Duda | 0 | 0 | 50 | 106 | 304 | 614 |
| 🇨🇳 Wang M. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 20 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Duda72.4
Wang M.71.8
FAQ
Where does Wang M. beat Duda?
Wang M. scores higher on peak, dominance, honours, statistics. Duda leads on longevity.
How is the Duda vs Wang M. score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Duda: 72.4, Wang M.: 71.8.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Duda vs Wang M.. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.