Who is better, Charles or Hilton?
Bob Charles leads with a GOAT score of 84.5 against 84.5 for Harold Hilton — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Bob Charles and Harold Hilton level at 84.5. Bob Charles leads on Longevity, Statistics. Harold Hilton leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Charles wins: Longevity, Statistics
Hilton wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/bob-charles-vs-harold-hilton
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Charles leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇳🇿 Charles | 0 | 0 | 25 | 57 | 197 | 485 |
| 🏴 Hilton | 0 | 0 | 35 | 75 | 228 | 508 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | CharlesRetired | HiltonRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Major titles | 1 | — |
| PGA Tour wins | 6 | — |
| Champions Tour wins | 23 | — |
| Senior major titles | 2 | — |
| Professional wins worldwide | 70 | — |
| Open Championships | — | 2 |
| Amateur Championships | — | 4 |
| US Amateur titles | — | 1 |
| Irish Open Amateur titles | — | 4 |
| Seasons in competition | — | 24 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 94 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 80 |
Bob Charles leads with a GOAT score of 84.5 against 84.5 for Harold Hilton — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Hilton scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Charles leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Charles: 84.5, Hilton: 84.5.
Make your case for Charles vs Hilton. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.