Who is better, Ferguson or Sarazen?
Gene Sarazen leads with a GOAT score of 86.4 against 86.3 for Bob Ferguson — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Gene Sarazen above Bob Ferguson: 86.4 vs 86.3. Gene Sarazen leads on Longevity. Bob Ferguson leads on Peak, Statistics, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Sarazen wins: Longevity
Ferguson wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/bob-ferguson-golf-vs-gene-sarazen
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Sarazen leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Ferguson | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 🇺🇸 Sarazen | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 11 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | FergusonRetired | SarazenRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Open Championships | 3 | — |
| Consecutive Open wins | 3 | — |
| Open runner-up finishes | 1 | — |
| Career years | 25 | — |
| Open top-five finishes | 8 | — |
| Major titles | — | 7 |
| PGA Tour wins | — | 39 |
| PGA Championships | — | 3 |
| US Open titles | — | 2 |
| Career Grand Slams | — | 1 |
| Ryder Cup appearances | — | 6 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 90 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 84 |
Gene Sarazen leads with a GOAT score of 86.4 against 86.3 for Bob Ferguson — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Ferguson scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. Sarazen leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Ferguson: 86.3, Sarazen: 86.4.
Make your case for Ferguson vs Sarazen. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.