Who is better, Hamilton or Seve?
Bob Hamilton leads with a GOAT score of 82.5 against 82.4 for Seve Ballesteros — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Bob Hamilton above Seve Ballesteros: 82.5 vs 82.4. Bob Hamilton leads on Statistics, Longevity, Peak. Seve Ballesteros leads on Dominance, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Hamilton wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics
Seve wins: Dominance, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/bob-hamilton-golf-vs-seve
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Hamilton leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Hamilton | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 55 | 81 |
| 🇪🇸 Seve | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 31 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | HamiltonRetired | SeveRetired |
|---|---|---|
| PGA Championships | 1 | — |
| PGA Tour wins | 6 | — |
| Career years | 28 | — |
| Lowest round shot | 59 | — |
| Major top-ten finishes | 6 | — |
| Major titles | — | 5 |
| European Tour wins | — | 50 |
| Open Championships | — | 3 |
| Masters titles | — | 2 |
| Order of Merit titles | — | 6 |
| Ryder Cup appearances | — | 8 |
| Dominance w25% | 74 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 82 |
| Honours w20% | 76 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 80 |
Bob Hamilton leads with a GOAT score of 82.5 against 82.4 for Seve Ballesteros — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Seve scores higher on dominance, honours. Hamilton leads on peak, statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Hamilton: 82.5, Seve: 82.4.
Make your case for Hamilton vs Seve. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.