Who is better, Watson or O'Meara?
Bubba Watson leads with a GOAT score of 80.0 against 80.0 for Mark O'Meara — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Watson vs O'Meara
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Bubba Watson and Mark O'Meara level at 80.0. Bubba Watson leads on Dominance, Honours, Statistics. Mark O'Meara leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
WatsonWinner
80.0Watson wins: Dominance, Honours, Statistics
O'Meara
80.0O'Meara wins: Longevity
Candidates
Locked to GolfShareable URL · /compare/bubba-watson-vs-mark-omeara
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Bubba Watson
80.0
Watson leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Bubba Watson
2. Mark O'Meara
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇺🇸 Mark O'Meara5 seasons played · career day 3,2876 wins
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Bubba Watson5 seasons played · career day 3,2862 wins
-66.7% vs O'Meara at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Watson | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| 🇺🇸 O'Meara | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Watson80.0
O'Meara80.0
FAQ
Where does O'Meara beat Watson?
O'Meara scores higher on longevity. Watson leads on dominance, honours, statistics.
How is the Watson vs O'Meara score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Watson: 80.0, O'Meara: 80.0.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Watson vs O'Meara. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.