GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Villegas vs Faulkner

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
FaulknerWinner
79.0

Faulkner wins: Peak, Longevity

Villegas
78.9

Villegas wins: Dominance, Honours, Statistics

Candidates
Locked to Golf

Shareable URL · /compare/camilo-villegas-vs-max-faulkner

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇬🇧 Max Faulkner
79.0

Faulkner leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories. Open champion at Royal Portrush in 1951.

1. Max Faulkner
79.0
2. Camilo Villegas
78.9

Category breakdown

Season form · Wins per season

Career timeline · Wins per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Wins per season
1. 🇬🇧 Max Faulkner5 seasons played · career day 1,8259 wins
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇨🇴 Camilo Villegas5 seasons played · career day 2,5563 wins
-66.7% vs Faulkner at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇨🇴 Villegas000003
🇬🇧 Faulkner0012915

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricVillegasActiveFaulknerRetired
PGA Tour wins4
Presidents Cup appearances2
Seasons on tour20
Career best world ranking7
Tour Championship wins1
Open Championship titles1
Ryder Cup appearances5
Professional wins16
Spanish Open titles2
Career span in years35
Dominance w25%7068
Peak w20%8890
Longevity w20%8288
Honours w20%7472
Statistics w15%8480

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Faulkner79.0
Villegas78.9
The people
Villegas
Faulkner

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Villegas vs Faulkner. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →