Who is better, Villegas or Faulkner?
Max Faulkner leads with a GOAT score of 79.0 against 78.9 for Camilo Villegas — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Max Faulkner above Camilo Villegas: 79.0 vs 78.9. Max Faulkner leads on Longevity, Peak. Camilo Villegas leads on Statistics, Dominance, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Faulkner wins: Peak, Longevity
Villegas wins: Dominance, Honours, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/camilo-villegas-vs-max-faulkner
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Faulkner leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇴 Villegas | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| 🇬🇧 Faulkner | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 15 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | VillegasActive | FaulknerRetired |
|---|---|---|
| PGA Tour wins | 4 | — |
| Presidents Cup appearances | 2 | — |
| Seasons on tour | 20 | — |
| Career best world ranking | 7 | — |
| Tour Championship wins | 1 | — |
| Open Championship titles | — | 1 |
| Ryder Cup appearances | — | 5 |
| Professional wins | — | 16 |
| Spanish Open titles | — | 2 |
| Career span in years | — | 35 |
| Dominance w25% | 70 | 68 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 82 | 88 |
| Honours w20% | 74 | 72 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 80 |
Max Faulkner leads with a GOAT score of 79.0 against 78.9 for Camilo Villegas — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Villegas scores higher on dominance, honours, statistics. Faulkner leads on peak, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Villegas: 78.9, Faulkner: 79.0.
Make your case for Villegas vs Faulkner. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.