Who is better, Cao or Cha?
Cha Hyo-sim leads with a GOAT score of 84.2 against 84.1 for Cao Yanhua — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Cha Hyo-sim above Cao Yanhua: 84.2 vs 84.1. Cha Hyo-sim leads on Longevity, Statistics. Cao Yanhua leads on Dominance, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Cha wins: Longevity, Statistics
Cao wins: Dominance, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/cao-yanhua-vs-cha-hyo-sim
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Cha leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇳 Cao | 0 | 0 | 64 | 142 | 326 | 660 |
| 🇰🇵 Cha | 0 | 0 | 55 | 120 | 375 | 735 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | CaoRetired | ChaActive |
|---|---|---|
| World Championship singles titles | 2 | — |
| World Championship team titles | 4 | — |
| World Cup titles | 1 | — |
| Asian Championship titles | 3 | — |
| World Championship medals | 8 | 2 |
| World Championship gold medals | — | 1 |
| Asian Championship medals | — | 2 |
| Olympic appearances | — | 1 |
| ITTF tour finals | — | 3 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 70 | 76 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 86 |
Cha Hyo-sim leads with a GOAT score of 84.2 against 84.1 for Cao Yanhua — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Cao scores higher on dominance, honours. Cha leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Cao: 84.1, Cha: 84.2.
Make your case for Cao vs Cha. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.