Who is better, Cao or Boros?
Cao Yanhua leads with a GOAT score of 84.1 against 84.1 for István Boros — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Cao Yanhua and István Boros level at 84.1. Cao Yanhua leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours. István Boros leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Cao wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Boros wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/cao-yanhua-vs-istvan-boros
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Cao leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇳 Cao | 0 | 0 | 64 | 142 | 326 | 660 |
| 🇭🇺 Boros | 0 | 0 | 55 | 120 | 375 | 699 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | CaoRetired | BorosRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Championship singles titles | 2 | — |
| World Championship team titles | 4 | — |
| World Cup titles | 1 | — |
| Asian Championship titles | 3 | — |
| World Championship medals | 8 | — |
| World Championship gold medals | — | 1 |
| European Championship medals | — | 2 |
| Hungarian titles | — | 3 |
| World Championship appearances | — | 4 |
| Swaythling Cup titles | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 70 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 86 |
Cao Yanhua leads with a GOAT score of 84.1 against 84.1 for István Boros — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Boros scores higher on statistics, longevity. Cao leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Cao: 84.1, Boros: 84.1.
Make your case for Cao vs Boros. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.