Who is better, Crișan or Magos?
Carmen Crișan leads with a GOAT score of 80.8 against 80.8 for Judit Magos — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Carmen Crișan and Judit Magos level at 80.8. Carmen Crișan leads on Statistics, Peak. Judit Magos leads on Longevity, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Crișan wins: Peak, Statistics
Magos wins: Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/carmen-crisan-vs-judit-magos-tt
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Crișan leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇷🇴 Crișan | 0 | 0 | 50 | 108 | 334 | 662 |
| 🇭🇺 Magos | 0 | 0 | 48 | 101 | 222 | 617 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | CrișanRetired | MagosRetired |
|---|---|---|
| European Championship medals | 2 | — |
| Romanian titles | 5 | — |
| World Championship appearances | 4 | — |
| European Championship appearances | 6 | — |
| Corbillon Cup appearances | 4 | — |
| European Championship titles | — | 2 |
| World Championship medals | — | 3 |
| European medals | — | 6 |
| National titles | — | 10 |
| Career world ranking best | — | 4 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 76 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 85 |
| Longevity w20% | 80 | 82 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 80 |
Carmen Crișan leads with a GOAT score of 80.8 against 80.8 for Judit Magos — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Magos scores higher on honours, longevity. Crișan leads on peak, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Crișan: 80.8, Magos: 80.8.
Make your case for Crișan vs Magos. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.