Who is better, Matthew or Nagle?
Catriona Matthew leads with a GOAT score of 80.8 against 80.8 for Kel Nagle — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Catriona Matthew and Kel Nagle level at 80.8. Catriona Matthew leads on Honours. Kel Nagle leads on Dominance, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Matthew wins: Honours
Nagle wins: Dominance, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/catriona-matthew-vs-kel-nagle
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Matthew leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Matthew | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| 🇦🇺 Nagle | 0 | 0 | 25 | 55 | 171 | 389 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | MatthewActive | NagleRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Major titles | 1 | 1 |
| LPGA wins | 4 | — |
| Ladies European Tour wins | 7 | — |
| Solheim Cup appearances | 9 | — |
| Solheim Cup wins as captain | 2 | — |
| Professional wins | — | 80 |
| Australian Open titles | — | 1 |
| World Cup team titles | — | 2 |
| Seasons played | — | 35 |
| Dominance w25% | 72 | 74 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 88 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 76 |
| Statistics w15% | 80 | 82 |
Catriona Matthew leads with a GOAT score of 80.8 against 80.8 for Kel Nagle — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Nagle scores higher on dominance, statistics. Matthew leads on honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Matthew: 80.8, Nagle: 80.8.
Make your case for Matthew vs Nagle. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.