Who is better, Cha or Boros?
Cha Hyo-sim leads with a GOAT score of 84.2 against 84.1 for István Boros — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Cha Hyo-sim above István Boros: 84.2 vs 84.1. Cha Hyo-sim leads on Dominance, Peak. István Boros leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Cha wins: Dominance, Peak
Boros wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/cha-hyo-sim-vs-istvan-boros
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Cha leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇰🇵 Cha | 0 | 0 | 55 | 120 | 375 | 735 |
| 🇭🇺 Boros | 0 | 0 | 55 | 120 | 375 | 699 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | ChaActive | BorosRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Championship gold medals | 1 | 1 |
| World Championship medals | 2 | — |
| Asian Championship medals | 2 | — |
| Olympic appearances | 1 | — |
| ITTF tour finals | 3 | — |
| European Championship medals | — | 2 |
| Hungarian titles | — | 3 |
| World Championship appearances | — | 4 |
| Swaythling Cup titles | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 82 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 76 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 86 |
Cha Hyo-sim leads with a GOAT score of 84.2 against 84.1 for István Boros — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Boros scores higher on longevity. Cha leads on peak, dominance.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Cha: 84.2, Boros: 84.1.
Make your case for Cha vs Boros. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.