Who is better, Cha or Yang?
Yang Young-ja leads with a GOAT score of 84.3 against 84.2 for Cha Hyo-sim — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Yang Young-ja above Cha Hyo-sim: 84.3 vs 84.2. Yang Young-ja leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours. Cha Hyo-sim leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Yang wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Cha wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/cha-hyo-sim-vs-yang-young-ja
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Yang leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇰🇵 Cha | 0 | 0 | 55 | 120 | 375 | 735 |
| 🇰🇷 Yang | 0 | 0 | 50 | 112 | 368 | 545 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | ChaActive | YangRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Championship gold medals | 1 | — |
| World Championship medals | 2 | 4 |
| Asian Championship medals | 2 | — |
| Olympic appearances | 1 | — |
| ITTF tour finals | 3 | — |
| Olympic gold medals | — | 1 |
| World doubles titles | — | 1 |
| Asian Games titles | — | 2 |
| National titles | — | 3 |
| Dominance w25% | 82 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 76 | 70 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 86 |
Yang Young-ja leads with a GOAT score of 84.3 against 84.2 for Cha Hyo-sim — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Cha scores higher on longevity. Yang leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Cha: 84.2, Yang: 84.3.
Make your case for Cha vs Yang. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.