Who is better, Cha or Zhuang?
Cha Hyo-sim leads with a GOAT score of 84.2 against 84.2 for Zhuang Zedong — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Cha Hyo-sim and Zhuang Zedong level at 84.2. Cha Hyo-sim leads on Longevity, Statistics. Zhuang Zedong leads on Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Cha wins: Longevity, Statistics
Zhuang wins: Dominance
Shareable URL · /compare/cha-hyo-sim-vs-zhuang-zedong
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Cha leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇰🇵 Cha | 0 | 0 | 55 | 120 | 375 | 735 |
| 🇨🇳 Zhuang | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 10 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | ChaActive | ZhuangRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Championship gold medals | 1 | — |
| World Championship medals | 2 | 7 |
| Asian Championship medals | 2 | — |
| Olympic appearances | 1 | — |
| ITTF tour finals | 3 | — |
| World singles titles | — | 3 |
| World team titles | — | 3 |
| Consecutive world finals | — | 3 |
| Chinese national titles | — | 4 |
| Dominance w25% | 82 | 88 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 76 | 70 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 84 |
Cha Hyo-sim leads with a GOAT score of 84.2 against 84.2 for Zhuang Zedong — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Zhuang scores higher on dominance. Cha leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Cha: 84.2, Zhuang: 84.2.
Make your case for Cha vs Zhuang. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.