Who is better, Schwartzel or Montgomerie?
Charl Schwartzel leads with a GOAT score of 77.5 against 77.5 for Colin Montgomerie — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Charl Schwartzel and Colin Montgomerie level at 77.5. Charl Schwartzel leads on Peak. Colin Montgomerie leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Schwartzel wins: Peak
Montgomerie wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/charl-schwartzel-vs-colin-montgomerie
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Schwartzel leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇿🇦 Schwartzel | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 9 |
| 🏴 Montgomerie | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | SchwartzelActive | MontgomerieActive |
|---|---|---|
| Major titles | 1 | — |
| DP World Tour wins | 12 | — |
| PGA Tour wins | 2 | — |
| Presidents Cup appearances | 4 | — |
| Career-high world ranking | 8 | — |
| Order of Merit titles | — | 8 |
| European Tour wins | — | 31 |
| Ryder Cup appearances | — | 8 |
| Senior major titles | — | 3 |
| Major runner-up finishes | — | 5 |
| Ryder Cup points | — | 23.5 |
| Dominance w25% | 70 | 70 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 82 |
| Longevity w20% | 80 | 86 |
| Honours w20% | 72 | 72 |
| Statistics w15% | 80 | 80 |
Loading votes
Create a free account to vote and comment.
Sign in to voteCharl Schwartzel leads with a GOAT score of 77.5 against 77.5 for Colin Montgomerie — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Montgomerie scores higher on longevity. Schwartzel leads on peak.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Schwartzel: 77.5, Montgomerie: 77.5.
Make your case for Schwartzel vs Montgomerie. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.