Who is better, Coody or Woosnam?
Charles Coody leads with a GOAT score of 78.0 against 77.8 for Ian Woosnam — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Coody vs Woosnam
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Charles Coody above Ian Woosnam: 78.0 vs 77.8. Charles Coody leads on Statistics, Peak, Longevity. Ian Woosnam leads on Dominance, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
CoodyWinner
78.0Coody wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics
Woosnam
77.8Woosnam wins: Dominance, Honours
Candidates
Locked to GolfShareable URL · /compare/charles-coody-vs-ian-woosnam
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Charles Coody
78.0
Coody leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Charles Coody
2. Ian Woosnam
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🏴 Ian Woosnam5 seasons played · career day 4,01711 wins
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Charles Coody5 seasons played · career day 2,1911 wins
-90.9% vs Woosnam at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Coody | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| 🏴 Woosnam | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Coody78.0
Woosnam77.8
FAQ
Where does Woosnam beat Coody?
Woosnam scores higher on dominance, honours. Coody leads on peak, statistics, longevity.
How is the Coody vs Woosnam score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Coody: 78.0, Woosnam: 77.8.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Coody vs Woosnam. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.