Who is better, Hull or Kerr?
Charley Hull leads with a GOAT score of 81.1 against 81.0 for Cristie Kerr — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Hull vs Kerr
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Charley Hull above Cristie Kerr: 81.1 vs 81.0. Charley Hull leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours. Cristie Kerr leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
HullWinner
81.1Hull wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Kerr
81.0Kerr wins: Longevity
Candidates
Locked to GolfShareable URL · /compare/charley-hull-vs-cristie-kerr
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇬🇧 Charley Hull
81.1
Hull leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Charley Hull
2. Cristie Kerr
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇺🇸 Cristie Kerr5 seasons played · career day 4,0176 wins
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇬🇧 Charley Hull5 seasons played · career day 1,8253 wins
-50.0% vs Kerr at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Hull | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| 🇺🇸 Kerr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Hull81.1
Kerr81.0
FAQ
Where does Kerr beat Hull?
Kerr scores higher on longevity. Hull leads on peak, dominance, honours, statistics.
How is the Hull vs Kerr score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Hull: 81.1, Kerr: 81.0.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Hull vs Kerr. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.