Who is better, Hull or Ko?
Charley Hull leads with a GOAT score of 81.1 against 81.1 for Lydia Ko — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Charley Hull and Lydia Ko level at 81.1. Charley Hull leads on Longevity, Statistics, Peak. Lydia Ko leads on Dominance, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Hull wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics
Ko wins: Dominance, Honours
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Hull leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Hull | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| 🇳🇿 Ko | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 13 | 17 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | HullActive | KoActive |
|---|---|---|
| LPGA Tour wins | 2 | 23 |
| Ladies European Tour wins | 4 | — |
| Solheim Cup appearances | 6 | — |
| Major runner-up finishes | 2 | — |
| Career best world ranking | 7 | — |
| Major titles | — | 3 |
| Olympic medals | — | 3 |
| Weeks at No. 1 | — | 104 |
| Hall of Fame points | — | 27 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 80 | 76 |
| Honours w20% | 78 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 82 |
Charley Hull leads with a GOAT score of 81.1 against 81.1 for Lydia Ko — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Ko scores higher on dominance, honours. Hull leads on peak, statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Hull: 81.1, Ko: 81.1.
Make your case for Hull vs Ko. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.