Who is better, Chen or Boroš?
Tamara Boroš leads with a GOAT score of 84.5 against 84.3 for Chen Longcan — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Tamara Boroš above Chen Longcan: 84.5 vs 84.3. Tamara Boroš leads on Longevity. Chen Longcan leads on Honours, Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Boroš wins: Longevity
Chen wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/chen-longcan-vs-tamara-boros
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Boroš leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇳 Chen | 0 | 0 | 50 | 112 | 271 | 535 |
| 🇭🇷 Boroš | 0 | 0 | 45 | 95 | 275 | 585 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | ChenRetired | BorošRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic gold medals | 1 | — |
| World team titles | 2 | — |
| World doubles titles | 1 | — |
| World Cup medals | 1 | — |
| Asian titles | 2 | — |
| European Championship medals | — | 5 |
| World Championship medals | — | 1 |
| World ranking peak | — | 5 |
| Pro Tour titles | — | 4 |
| Croatian titles | — | 8 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 72 | 86 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 86 |
Tamara Boroš leads with a GOAT score of 84.5 against 84.3 for Chen Longcan — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Chen scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Boroš leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Chen: 84.3, Boroš: 84.5.
Make your case for Chen vs Boroš. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.