Who is better, Chen or Lebesson?
Emmanuel Lebesson leads with a GOAT score of 78.2 against 78.1 for Chen Szu-yu — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Emmanuel Lebesson above Chen Szu-yu: 78.2 vs 78.1. Emmanuel Lebesson leads on Honours, Dominance. Chen Szu-yu leads on Statistics, Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Lebesson wins: Dominance, Honours
Chen wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/chen-szu-yu-vs-emmanuel-lebesson
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Lebesson leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇹🇼 Chen | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 37 |
| 🇫🇷 Lebesson | 0 | 0 | 48 | 102 | 300 | 636 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | ChenActive | LebessonActive |
|---|---|---|
| Asian Games medals | 2 | — |
| Olympic appearances | 3 | — |
| World Tour medals | 5 | — |
| Career-high world ranking | 15 | — |
| World Championship appearances | 7 | — |
| European titles | — | 1 |
| Olympic medals | — | 1 |
| French national titles | — | 3 |
| European team medals | — | 3 |
| Years at the top level | — | 19 |
| Dominance w25% | 70 | 72 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 82 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 72 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 76 |
Emmanuel Lebesson leads with a GOAT score of 78.2 against 78.1 for Chen Szu-yu — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Chen scores higher on statistics, longevity. Lebesson leads on dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Chen: 78.1, Lebesson: 78.2.
Make your case for Chen vs Lebesson. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.