GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Chen X. vs Solja

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
Chen X.Winner
78.3

Chen X. wins: Dominance, Statistics

Solja
78.2

Solja wins: Longevity

Candidates
Locked to Table Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/chen-xingtong-vs-petrissa-solja

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇨🇳 Chen Xingtong
78.3

Chen X. leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. World doubles champion and a World Cup team gold medallist for China.

1. Chen Xingtong
78.3
2. Petrissa Solja
78.2

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇨🇳 Chen Xingtong5 seasons played · career day 1,825378 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇩🇪 Petrissa Solja5 seasons played · career day 1,825330 titles
-12.7% vs Chen X. at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇨🇳 Chen X.0058128378710
🇩🇪 Solja0050108330686

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricChen X.ActiveSoljaActive
World Championship titles2
World Team Cup golds2
World Tour titles6
Asian Championship medals4
Best world ranking3
European titles1
Olympic medals2
European team titles4
World Championship medals1
Years at the top level15
Dominance w25%7672
Peak w20%8484
Longevity w20%7480
Honours w20%8080
Statistics w15%7876

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Chen X.78.3
Solja78.2
The people
Chen X.
Solja

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Chen X. vs Solja. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →