Who is better, Chen or Douglas?
Desmond Douglas leads with a GOAT score of 80.6 against 80.5 for Chen Zhibin — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Desmond Douglas above Chen Zhibin: 80.6 vs 80.5. Desmond Douglas leads on Longevity. Chen Zhibin leads on Statistics, Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Douglas wins: Longevity
Chen wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/chen-zhibin-vs-desmond-douglas
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Douglas leads in 1 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇳 Chen | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 47 |
| 🇬🇧 Douglas | 0 | 0 | 50 | 110 | 336 | 700 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | ChenRetired | DouglasRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Championship golds | 2 | — |
| World Championship medals | 4 | — |
| Asian Championship titles | 2 | — |
| World Cup medals | 1 | — |
| Career highest world ranking | 3 | — |
| English national titles | — | 11 |
| European medals | — | 3 |
| Commonwealth Championship golds | — | 5 |
| Career high European ranking | — | 1 |
| Years at the top level | — | 21 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 74 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 70 | 88 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 78 |
Desmond Douglas leads with a GOAT score of 80.6 against 80.5 for Chen Zhibin — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Chen scores higher on peak, dominance, honours, statistics. Douglas leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Chen: 80.5, Douglas: 80.6.
Make your case for Chen vs Douglas. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.