Who is better, Chen or Lupulesku?
Chen Zhibin leads with a GOAT score of 80.5 against 80.5 for Ilija Lupulesku — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Chen Zhibin and Ilija Lupulesku level at 80.5. Chen Zhibin leads on Dominance, Peak, Statistics. Ilija Lupulesku leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Chen wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Lupulesku wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/chen-zhibin-vs-ilija-lupulesku-tt
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Chen leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇳 Chen | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 47 |
| 🇷🇸 Lupulesku | 0 | 0 | 48 | 103 | 310 | 655 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | ChenRetired | LupuleskuRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Championship golds | 2 | — |
| World Championship medals | 4 | 2 |
| Asian Championship titles | 2 | — |
| World Cup medals | 1 | — |
| Career highest world ranking | 3 | — |
| Olympic medals | — | 1 |
| European Championship medals | — | 3 |
| Olympic appearances | — | 4 |
| Career world ranking best | — | 8 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 74 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 70 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 80 |
Chen Zhibin leads with a GOAT score of 80.5 against 80.5 for Ilija Lupulesku — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Lupulesku scores higher on longevity. Chen leads on peak, dominance, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Chen: 80.5, Lupulesku: 80.5.
Make your case for Chen vs Lupulesku. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.