GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Cheng vs Struse

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
ChengWinner
82.9

Cheng wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics

Struse
82.9

Struse wins: Longevity

Candidates
Locked to Table Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/cheng-hongxia-vs-nicole-struse

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇨🇳 Cheng Hongxia
82.9

Cheng leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. World Championship doubles medallist for China.

1. Cheng Hongxia
82.9
2. Nicole Struse
82.9

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇨🇳 Cheng Hongxia5 seasons played · career day 1,826360 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇩🇪 Nicole Struse5 seasons played · career day 1,825279 titles
-22.5% vs Cheng at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇨🇳 Cheng0050111266655
🇩🇪 Struse004595279601

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricChengRetiredStruseRetired
World Championship medals2
ITTF Pro Tour titles4
Chinese national medals5
World Championship appearances3
Asian Championship medals2
European Championship titles3
German titles6
European team medals6
Olympic appearances4
World ranking peak12
Dominance w25%8078
Peak w20%9088
Longevity w20%7686
Honours w20%8480
Statistics w15%8684

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Cheng82.9
Struse82.9
The people
Cheng
Struse

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Cheng vs Struse. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →