GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Cheng vs Bengtsson

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
ChengWinner
82.9

Cheng wins: Honours, Statistics

Bengtsson
82.8

Bengtsson wins: Longevity

Candidates
Locked to Table Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/cheng-hongxia-vs-stellan-bengtsson

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇨🇳 Cheng Hongxia
82.9

Cheng leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. World Championship doubles medallist for China.

1. Cheng Hongxia
82.9
2. Stellan Bengtsson
82.8

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇨🇳 Cheng Hongxia5 seasons played · career day 1,826360 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇸🇪 Stellan Bengtsson5 seasons played · career day 2,19113 titles
-96.4% vs Cheng at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇨🇳 Cheng0050111266655
🇸🇪 Bengtsson0001720

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricChengRetiredBengtssonRetired
World Championship medals29
ITTF Pro Tour titles4
Chinese national medals5
World Championship appearances3
Asian Championship medals2
World singles titles1
European titles5
Swedish titles10
World team medals5
Dominance w25%8080
Peak w20%9090
Longevity w20%7682
Honours w20%8482
Statistics w15%8680

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Cheng82.9
Bengtsson82.8
The people
Cheng
Bengtsson

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Cheng vs Bengtsson. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →