Who is better, Cheng or Ogimura?
Ichiro Ogimura leads with a GOAT score of 76.9 against 76.8 for Cheng I-ching — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Ichiro Ogimura above Cheng I-ching: 76.9 vs 76.8. Ichiro Ogimura leads on Honours, Dominance, Peak. Cheng I-ching leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Ogimura wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Cheng wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/cheng-i-ching-vs-ichiro-ogimura
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Ogimura leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇹🇼 Cheng | 0 | 0 | 52 | 112 | 252 | 660 |
| 🇯🇵 Ogimura | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 27 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | ChengActive | OgimuraRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic medals | 1 | — |
| World Tour titles | 5 | — |
| Asian Games medals | 3 | — |
| Best world ranking | 5 | — |
| Olympic Games contested | 4 | — |
| World Championship singles titles | — | 2 |
| World Championship titles (all) | — | 12 |
| World team titles | — | 5 |
| Asian titles | — | 4 |
| Japanese titles | — | 6 |
| Hall of Fame inductions | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 70 | 76 |
| Peak w20% | 82 | 84 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 70 |
| Honours w20% | 72 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 78 | 74 |
Ichiro Ogimura leads with a GOAT score of 76.9 against 76.8 for Cheng I-ching — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Cheng scores higher on statistics, longevity. Ogimura leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Cheng: 76.8, Ogimura: 76.9.
Make your case for Cheng vs Ogimura. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.