Who is better, Barnes or Karlsson?
Chester Barnes leads with a GOAT score of 76.5 against 76.4 for Mattias Karlsson — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Chester Barnes above Mattias Karlsson: 76.5 vs 76.4. Chester Barnes leads on Dominance, Peak. Mattias Karlsson leads on Longevity, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Barnes wins: Dominance, Peak
Karlsson wins: Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/chester-barnes-tt-vs-mattias-karlsson-tt
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Barnes leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏴 Barnes | 0 | 0 | 46 | 99 | 297 | 619 |
| 🇸🇪 Karlsson | 0 | 0 | 44 | 92 | 260 | 540 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BarnesRetired | KarlssonActive |
|---|---|---|
| English titles | 5 | — |
| European Championship appearances | 5 | — |
| World Championship appearances | 6 | — |
| English Open titles | 2 | — |
| International caps | 100 | — |
| World Championship team medals | — | 1 |
| European team medals | — | 2 |
| Olympic appearances | — | 2 |
| Career world ranking best | — | 20 |
| Swedish titles | — | 3 |
| Dominance w25% | 72 | 70 |
| Peak w20% | 82 | 80 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 74 | 76 |
| Statistics w15% | 78 | 78 |
Chester Barnes leads with a GOAT score of 76.5 against 76.4 for Mattias Karlsson — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Karlsson scores higher on honours, longevity. Barnes leads on peak, dominance.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Barnes: 76.5, Karlsson: 76.4.
Make your case for Barnes vs Karlsson. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.