Who is better, Rodríguez or Fernie?
Willie Fernie leads with a GOAT score of 81.5 against 81.4 for Chi-Chi Rodríguez — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Willie Fernie above Chi-Chi Rodríguez: 81.5 vs 81.4. Willie Fernie leads on Peak, Dominance, Statistics. Chi-Chi Rodríguez leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Fernie wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Rodríguez wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/chi-chi-rodriguez-vs-willie-fernie
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Fernie leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇵🇷 Rodríguez | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 |
| 🇬🇧 Fernie | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 21 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | RodríguezRetired | FernieRetired |
|---|---|---|
| PGA Tour wins | 8 | — |
| Champions Tour wins | 22 | — |
| Hall of Fame inductions | 1 | — |
| Ryder Cup appearances | 1 | — |
| Professional seasons | 45 | — |
| Open Championships | — | 1 |
| Open runner-up finishes | — | 3 |
| Open top-five finishes | — | 8 |
| Career years | — | 20 |
| Course designs | — | 10 |
| Dominance w25% | 72 | 76 |
| Peak w20% | 84 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 92 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 78 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 86 |
Willie Fernie leads with a GOAT score of 81.5 against 81.4 for Chi-Chi Rodríguez — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Rodríguez scores higher on longevity. Fernie leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Rodríguez: 81.4, Fernie: 81.5.
Make your case for Rodríguez vs Fernie. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.