GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Chiang vs Falck

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
ChiangWinner
81.9

Chiang wins: Longevity

Falck
81.5

Falck wins: Peak

Candidates
Locked to Table Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/chiang-peng-lung-vs-mattias-falck

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇹🇼 Chiang Peng-lung
81.9

Chiang leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. Asian Games medallist and long-time Taiwanese international.

1. Chiang Peng-lung
81.9
2. Mattias Falck
81.5

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇸🇪 Mattias Falck5 seasons played · career day 3,287405 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇹🇼 Chiang Peng-lung5 seasons played · career day 1,826294 titles
-27.4% vs Falck at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇹🇼 Chiang0050104226610
🇸🇪 Falck00000405

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricChiangRetiredFalckActive
Asian Games medals2
Olympic appearances2
World Championship appearances6
National titles4
ITTF tour medals5
World Championship medals2
European Championship medals4
World Tour titles2
Career highest world ranking5
Olympic Games2
Dominance w25%7676
Peak w20%8688
Longevity w20%8682
Honours w20%7878
Statistics w15%8686

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Chiang81.9
Falck81.5
The people
Chiang
Falck

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Chiang vs Falck. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →