Who is better, Evans or Morris?
Chick Evans leads with a GOAT score of 84.5 against 84.5 for Young Tom Morris — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Chick Evans and Young Tom Morris level at 84.5. Chick Evans leads on Longevity. Young Tom Morris leads on Dominance, Honours, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Evans wins: Longevity
Morris wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/chick-evans-vs-young-tom-morris
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Evans leads in 1 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Evans | 0 | 0 | 30 | 67 | 222 | 530 |
| 🏴 Morris | 0 | 0 | 40 | 92 | 316 | 650 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | EvansRetired | MorrisRetired |
|---|---|---|
| US Open titles | 1 | — |
| US Amateur titles | 2 | — |
| Western Amateur titles | 8 | — |
| US Amateur appearances | 50 | — |
| Seasons in competition | 56 | — |
| Open Championships | — | 4 |
| Consecutive Open titles | — | 4 |
| Championship Belt retired | — | 1 |
| Age at first Open win | — | 17 |
| Open scoring records set | — | 3 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 94 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 96 |
| Longevity w20% | 92 | 58 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 78 | 84 |
Chick Evans leads with a GOAT score of 84.5 against 84.5 for Young Tom Morris — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Morris scores higher on peak, dominance, honours, statistics. Evans leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Evans: 84.5, Morris: 84.5.
Make your case for Evans vs Morris. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.