Who is better, Harbert or Woosnam?
Ian Woosnam leads with a GOAT score of 77.8 against 77.7 for Chick Harbert — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Harbert vs Woosnam
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Ian Woosnam above Chick Harbert: 77.8 vs 77.7. Ian Woosnam leads on Dominance, Honours. Chick Harbert leads on Peak, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
WoosnamWinner
77.8Woosnam wins: Dominance, Honours
Harbert
77.7Harbert wins: Peak, Statistics
Candidates
Locked to GolfShareable URL · /compare/chick-harbert-vs-ian-woosnam
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🏴 Ian Woosnam
77.8
Woosnam leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Ian Woosnam
2. Chick Harbert
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🏴 Ian Woosnam5 seasons played · career day 4,01711 wins
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Chick Harbert5 seasons played · career day 2,5565 wins
-54.5% vs Woosnam at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Harbert | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8 |
| 🏴 Woosnam | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Woosnam77.8
Harbert77.7
FAQ
Where does Harbert beat Woosnam?
Harbert scores higher on peak, statistics. Woosnam leads on dominance, honours.
How is the Harbert vs Woosnam score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Harbert: 77.7, Woosnam: 77.8.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Harbert vs Woosnam. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.