Who is better, Cho or Liu Shiwen?
Cho Dae-seong leads with a GOAT score of 75.8 against 75.5 for Liu Shiwen — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Cho Dae-seong above Liu Shiwen: 75.8 vs 75.5. Cho Dae-seong leads on Statistics, Peak. Liu Shiwen leads on Honours, Dominance, Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Cho wins: Peak, Statistics
Liu Shiwen wins: Dominance, Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/cho-dae-seong-vs-liu-shiwen
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Cho leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇰🇷 Cho | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 200 | 361 |
| 🇨🇳 Liu Shiwen | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 31 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | ChoActive | Liu ShiwenRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Championship team medals | 2 | — |
| Asian Games medals | 2 | — |
| World Tour medals | 3 | — |
| Career highest world ranking | 20 | — |
| National team seasons | 9 | — |
| World Cup singles titles | — | 5 |
| World Championship singles titles | — | 1 |
| Olympic golds | — | 1 |
| World team titles | — | 5 |
| Months at No. 1 | — | 38 |
| ITTF Tour titles | — | 24 |
| Dominance w25% | 70 | 72 |
| Peak w20% | 84 | 80 |
| Longevity w20% | 72 | 74 |
| Honours w20% | 74 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 74 |
Cho Dae-seong leads with a GOAT score of 75.8 against 75.5 for Liu Shiwen — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Liu Shiwen scores higher on dominance, honours, longevity. Cho leads on peak, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Cho: 75.8, Liu Shiwen: 75.5.
Make your case for Cho vs Liu Shiwen. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.