Who is better, Cho or Baum?
Cho Dae-seong leads with a GOAT score of 75.8 against 75.4 for Patrick Baum — a gap of 0.4 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Cho Dae-seong above Patrick Baum: 75.8 vs 75.4. Cho Dae-seong leads on Statistics, Peak, Dominance. Patrick Baum leads on Longevity, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Cho wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Baum wins: Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/cho-dae-seong-vs-patrick-baum-tt
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Cho leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇰🇷 Cho | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 200 | 361 |
| 🇩🇪 Baum | 0 | 0 | 42 | 89 | 256 | 542 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | ChoActive | BaumRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Championship team medals | 2 | 1 |
| Asian Games medals | 2 | — |
| World Tour medals | 3 | — |
| Career highest world ranking | 20 | — |
| National team seasons | 9 | — |
| European team titles | — | 2 |
| Olympic appearances | — | 1 |
| Career world ranking best | — | 22 |
| Bundesliga seasons | — | 15 |
| Dominance w25% | 70 | 68 |
| Peak w20% | 84 | 79 |
| Longevity w20% | 72 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 74 | 76 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 76 |
Cho Dae-seong leads with a GOAT score of 75.8 against 75.4 for Patrick Baum — a gap of 0.4 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Baum scores higher on honours, longevity. Cho leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Cho: 75.8, Baum: 75.4.
Make your case for Cho vs Baum. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.