GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Chuang vs De Nutte

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
ChuangWinner
81.9

Chuang wins: no category outright

De Nutte
81.9

De Nutte wins: no category outright

Candidates
Locked to Table Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/chuang-chia-fu-vs-sarah-de-nutte

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇹🇼 Chuang Chia-Fu
81.9

Chuang leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories. Asian Games medallist and a long-serving Taiwanese international.

1. Chuang Chia-Fu
81.9
2. Sarah De Nutte
81.9

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇹🇼 Chuang Chia-Fu5 seasons played · career day 1,825301 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇱🇺 Sarah De Nutte5 seasons played · career day 1,826296 titles
-1.7% vs Chuang at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇹🇼 Chuang0050105301635
🇱🇺 De Nutte0050105228614

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricChuangActiveDe NutteActive
Asian Games medals2
World Championship appearances66
Olympic appearances12
National titles5
ITTF tour finals4
European Games medals2
Luxembourg titles10
European Championship appearances8
Dominance w25%7676
Peak w20%8686
Longevity w20%8686
Honours w20%7878
Statistics w15%8686

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Chuang81.9
De Nutte81.9
The people
Chuang
De Nutte

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Chuang vs De Nutte. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →