GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Chuang vs Hayata

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
HayataWinner
80.2

Hayata wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics

Chuang
80.0

Chuang wins: Longevity

Candidates
Locked to Table Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/chuang-chih-yuan-vs-hina-hayata

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇯🇵 Hina Hayata
80.2

Hayata leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. Olympic singles bronze medallist in Paris 2024 and a world top-five player.

1. Hina Hayata
80.2
2. Chuang Chih-yuan
80.0

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇯🇵 Hina Hayata5 seasons played · career day 1,826353 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇹🇼 Chuang Chih-yuan5 seasons played · career day 1,826336 titles
-4.8% vs Hayata at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇹🇼 Chuang0054114256676
🇯🇵 Hayata0055119269719

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricChuangActiveHayataActive
Olympic Games contested6
World Tour titles8
Asian Games golds1
Best world ranking3
World Championship medals22
Olympic medals2
Japanese national titles2
WTT titles4
Career high world ranking4
Dominance w25%7278
Peak w20%8488
Longevity w20%9272
Honours w20%7482
Statistics w15%8082

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Hayata80.2
Chuang80.0
The people
Chuang
Hayata

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Chuang vs Hayata. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →