Who is better, Chuang or Berczik?
Chuang Chih-yuan leads with a GOAT score of 80.0 against 79.9 for Zoltán Berczik — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Chuang Chih-yuan above Zoltán Berczik: 80.0 vs 79.9. Chuang Chih-yuan leads on Longevity, Statistics. Zoltán Berczik leads on Honours, Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Chuang wins: Longevity, Statistics
Berczik wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/chuang-chih-yuan-vs-zoltan-berczik
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Chuang leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇹🇼 Chuang | 0 | 0 | 54 | 114 | 256 | 676 |
| 🇭🇺 Berczik | 0 | 0 | 50 | 108 | 248 | 692 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | ChuangActive | BerczikRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic Games contested | 6 | — |
| World Tour titles | 8 | — |
| Asian Games golds | 1 | — |
| Best world ranking | 3 | — |
| World Championship medals | 2 | 4 |
| European titles | — | 2 |
| Hungarian national titles | — | 5 |
| European medals | — | 6 |
| Years at the top level | — | 15 |
| Dominance w25% | 72 | 76 |
| Peak w20% | 84 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 92 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 74 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 80 | 78 |
Chuang Chih-yuan leads with a GOAT score of 80.0 against 79.9 for Zoltán Berczik — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Berczik scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Chuang leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Chuang: 80.0, Berczik: 79.9.
Make your case for Chuang vs Berczik. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.