Who is better, Bergeret or Alser?
Hans Alser leads with a GOAT score of 80.3 against 80.2 for Claude Bergeret — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Hans Alser above Claude Bergeret: 80.3 vs 80.2. Hans Alser leads on Dominance, Honours. Claude Bergeret leads on Statistics, Peak, Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Alser wins: Dominance, Honours
Bergeret wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/claude-bergeret-vs-hans-alser
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Alser leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇫🇷 Bergeret | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 30 |
| 🇸🇪 Alser | 0 | 0 | 52 | 114 | 268 | 704 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BergeretRetired | AlserRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World titles | 1 | — |
| European medals | 3 | — |
| French national titles | 9 | — |
| World Championship appearances | 7 | — |
| Career span in years | 15 | — |
| European titles | — | 2 |
| World team titles | — | 1 |
| World Championship medals | — | 4 |
| Swedish national titles | — | 6 |
| Years at the top level | — | 15 |
| Dominance w25% | 72 | 76 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 80 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 78 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 78 |
Hans Alser leads with a GOAT score of 80.3 against 80.2 for Claude Bergeret — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Bergeret scores higher on peak, statistics, longevity. Alser leads on dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Bergeret: 80.2, Alser: 80.3.
Make your case for Bergeret vs Alser. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.